Once again, make the choice
Once again, the public is asked to make a decision. If you are to believe the WH Press Secretary, Scott McClellan, fake reporter Jeff Gannon sat a few feet away from the POTUS and nobody said boo. He passed a background check, was allowed in the press room with a fake name, and none of this was found out by any of our huge, expensive, liberty-crushing intelligence agencies.
Or, he was planted there by the White House, who wanted another mouthpiece to promote their crackpot notions of economic ruin and world supremacy in the media. Much like Armstrong and the other “writers” on the take.
Ok, you make the choice: Was our security and intelligence network stupid and this guy slipped thru, or was it manipulated? And once you answer that, ask the same question about 9/11.
Nice overview here.
And remember our mantra here at TTP:
If you have to lie to make your point, you don’t have a point to make.
P.S: Here in Atlanta we have our own version of Rush, Hannity et al in Neal Boortz. Formerly calling himself a libertarian, he now snorts at the same trough as all other wingnut media hogs. I sent him this email this morning, after doing a search on his website:
Documents 1 – 20 of 28 matches for berger
No matches were found for ‘gannon’
You hypercrital hog. Try pulling your nose out of the GOP ass and actually serve a public function, how about? Report on NEWS, not Bush brainwashing.
I dare ya. </b>
Neal wet himself when the whole “documents in his socks” episode blew up with Sandy Berger, Clinton appointee. Funny, he didn’t find the Jeff Gannon scenario of a single mention. I guess we can call this lying by omission. Pig.
P.S.S…Guess I jumped the gun. He mentions it today. And surprise, he finds nothing wrong, in fact, finds another chance to bash Democrats:
There is a lot of controversy about this White House reporter that asked a question during President Bush’s recent press conference. Since the question was not hostile to the president, immediately the leftists that run liberal blogs and websites immediately tried to find out who he was, where he came from and why he wasn’t a Bush-hating Democrat like so much of the rest of the White House press corps.
Ok, it wasn’t “a question”- it was repeated access to the president. Again, lying by omisson.
